+1.415.830.5520

   
The Skill of Executive Online Social Networking - Why It's Important and How to Do It PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 17 February 2012 16:24

by Scott S. Elliott, Principal and Founder

 

 

Online Social Networking is for teenagers and geeks - right? Not any more. Many professionals and executives are using social networking to increase their creativity and productivity, to meet peers and experts, to find and make deals, and to enhance their careers.

 

All executives spend most of their time networking. Networking is what happens in meetings, on teleconferences, at group lunches, visits with customers, doing email or just talking in the hallway. These forms of networking get work done and keep the company going, but they are generally restricted to a relatively small "molecule" of coworkers, suppliers and customers. This "closed" networking group can lead to a stagnation of ideas and behaviors that is not good for the company, or for the careers of individuals.

 

Last Updated on Friday, 17 February 2012 16:46
 
Want to Get New Products to Market Faster? Try Postponement PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 13 February 2012 23:27

by Scott S. Elliott, Principal and Founder

 

 

How can postponing anything speed development and reduce time to market?

 

In Supply Chain design, there is a concept known as Postponement Manufacturing. In this concept, work-in-process is stored in a lower value (unfinished) state and as close as practical to the end customer or retailer, with only low-risk, fast processes remaining to complete fabrication and/or add custom touches. This strategy minimizes the cost and maximizes the speed of delivering products to the end user.

 

A good example is house paint.  A few decades ago, paint was manufactured in many hundreds of colors, packaged in cans, and sold to retail shops as finished goods. To buy house paint, painters took their color samples to the paint store and tried to match them with the samples on the labels. This process was expensive because the paint store had to carry a huge inventory, much of which degraded before it could be sold (known as "rottage" in supply chain speak). It was also time consuming and frustrating for the buyer because it took a lot of time to find the appropriate color, and she could never be certain that the color, when dry, would be exactly right.

 

Now everything has changed.  The retailers buy only white paint, plus a limited number of dyes in primary colors.  A special scanner with computer software scans and analyzes the customer's color sample (which may be on any material), and reports the mixture of paint and dye quantities that will match the color exactly to satisfy the customer's need. A paint shop employee then adds the specified dyes to the paint and mixes it to the finished product. This process takes only a few minutes - thus it is very fast and very low risk. Storing just one color of (unfinished) paint, the retailer saves significant money in inventory carrying costs and sells everything before it degrades - passing those savings on to the consumer.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 00:00
 
Treat Your Key Suppliers Like Family - Only Better PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 09 February 2012 01:09
by Scott S. Elliott, Principal and Founder
 
 

 

 

Every business leader faces the "make or buy" decision many times. He or she must answer: "what are our core competencies to be kept in-house, and what should we purchase or outsource?" Most technology businesses have evolved from the "vertically integrated" concepts of the 1960s and 1970s - where supplies were only materials and commodities -  to much more flexible and largely outsource-driven business models today. In the extreme, a few companies outsource almost everything, just taking orders and controlling the flow of finished goods from suppliers to customers.

 

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 12 February 2012 06:56
 
Three Essential Elements for Change PDF Print E-mail
Saturday, 14 January 2012 00:27
By Ed Powers, Principal
TechZecs LLC
 
 
All organizations face periodic turning points due to sagging profits, aggressive competitors, disruptive technologies, or beckoning markets. Yet, if leaders do not enact changes swiftly, they can watch their enterprises spiral downward.
 
Change is never easy, and surprisingly, strategy itself is not the problem. According to Fortune, approximately 70% of CEOs who lost their jobs did so not because they had a bad plan, but because they failed to execute. Figuring out what to do is relatively easy, but few organizations are good at the hard stuff— following through. When change is complex and so much hinges on the outcome, CEOs can’t afford missteps.
Last Updated on Saturday, 14 January 2012 00:39
 
The MBO Quandry PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 23 November 2011 17:18
by Ed Powers, Principal
TechZecs LLC
 
 

I had an interesting debate recently with a colleague at a successful consulting firm. Their practice focuses on making management more accountable through “pay for performance,” which means if managers hit goals, they get a bigger bonus. His firm has prospered, yet the words of late quality guru W. Edwards Deming dogged me.

 Objective

Let me be clear: I’m a huge proponent of accountability. Without it, nothing gets done. Yet, the most popular methods CEO’s choose today are ineffective, and often produce unintended and harmful consequences.

 

Management by Objective (MBO) has been widely used for years. The CEO requires the VP of sales to “grow sales by 10%,” manufacturing VP to “reduce costs by 5%,” and VP of finance to “reduce overdue accounts receivable by 7%.” Using MBO, the CEO concentrates on what, not how—the manager determines the latter. To provide incentive, the CEO promises fat bonuses for meeting goals. Management 101. Carrot and stick.

 

What happens next is predictable. The finance VP gets tough, demanding prompt payment and putting delinquent accounts up for collection. The VP of sales shouts as chronically late-paying but important customers get upset and cancel orders. The manufacturing VP based his production forecast on the higher sales goal and gets stuck with too much inventory at year-end. The VP of finance achieves her goal and gets her bonus, but at great expense. Tempers boil. Teamwork collapses. Sales are down and costs are up. Did the CEO get what he wanted?

 

Deming railed at MBO in his seminal work, Out of the Crisis. “The idea of a merit rating is alluring. The sound of the words captivates the imagination: pay for what you get; get what you pay for; motivate people to do their best, for their own good. The effect is exactly the opposite of what the words promise. Everyone propels himself forward, or tries to, for his own good, on his own life preserver. The organization is the loser.”

Last Updated on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 17:31
 
«StartPrev1234NextEnd»


Page 1 of 4
 

Follow us

 

follow2_facebook   follow_linkedin   follow_twitter

 

Ask TechZecs

sendUsConcerns

clickhere

 

  Do you have a question that you would like to ask the experts at TechZecs? 

 

Subscibe

subscribe

Subscribe now and we  will deliver this directly into your mail box.

[ Subscribe now ]

Who's Online

We have 1 guest online

 

 

Corporate Headquarters:

TechZecs, LLC
1730 Kearny Street, Suite F-3
San Francisco, California
94133 USA
  Contact numbers:

Telephone: +1.415.830.5520

Email: info@techzecs.com

  Principal and Founder:

Dr. Scott S. Elliott
Email: scott.elliott@techzecs.com